The Double-Edged Sword of “Being Out” at Work: Its Impact on Perceived Professionalism, Morality, and Cooperation Intentions 

Project info

Work package
  • Work
Sustainability threat
  • External Shocks
Challenge
  • Reshaping organizational forms

Study info

Description of Study
This research examines the interpersonal consequences of sexual identity disclosure, focusing on social perceptions (professionalism, competence, sociability, and morality) and intentions to cooperate (informally or formally). Across two studies, participants evaluated a fictitious gay employee who either disclosed or concealed his sexual orientation at work. In Study 1, 88 Dutch participants assessed the employee’s social attributes. Results showed that disclosing sexual orientation led to lower perceptions of professionalism compared to concealing it. Moreover, participants with stronger heteronormative beliefs rated the employee as less professional overall. Study 2, which comprised a politically diverse sample of 415 UK participants, replicated and extended the findings from Study 1. It revealed that identity disclosure (vs. concealment) negatively impacted perceived professionalism, which was associated with participants’ reduced willingness to formally cooperate with the employee (e.g., collaborating on a work task) among those high in heteronormative beliefs. Conversely, among those low in heteronormative beliefs, disclosure enhanced perceived sociability and morality, alongside increased informal cooperation intentions (e.g., socializing during lunch). These findings underscore the double-edged nature of sexual identity disclosure, revealing the complex challenges faced by individuals with minoritized sexual identities. Keywords: LGBTQIA+, workplace, heteronormativity, identity disclosure, cooperation.
Study research question
Collection provenance
  • Collected during project
Collection methods
  • Vignette survey
Personal data
No
External Source
Source description
File formats
Data types
  • Structured
Languages
  • English
Coverage start
Coverage end
Spatial coverage
Collection period start
Collection period end

Variables

Unit
Unit description
Sample size
Sampling method
Hypothesis
Theory
Variable type
Variable name
Variable description
Discipline-specific operationalizations
Conflict of interest
None

Data packages

Publications

Documents

Filename
Description
Date

Ethics

Ethical assessment
Yes
Ethical committee
Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences of Utrecht University