Project info
Project name
2.5 Family Members Stimulating Community Involvement
Work package
- Care
Sustainability threat
- Spillovers
Challenge
- Facilitating work life balance
Study info
Related studies according to this researcher
Informal Volunteering and Socialization Effects: Examining Modelling and Encouragement by Parents and Partner
More or less help? A longitudinal investigation of the positive and negative consequences of divorce for informal helping
Related studies according to other researchers
Testing the Informal Care Model: Intrapersonal Change in Care Provision Intensity during the First Lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic
More or less help? A longitudinal investigation of the positive and negative consequences of divorce for informal helping
Description of Study
Like many European countries, the Netherlands went into a lockdown to combat the spread of COVID-19 in March 2020. Politicians called for solidarity and to help each other to get through the lockdown. Yet, COVID policy restrictions discouraged social interactions, which are necessary for helping. Hence, despite calls for solidarity, informal volunteering, or helping outside of organizations, likely declined during the first lockdown. This paper provides more insight into the change in informal volunteering during the first lockdown and the extent to which this change depended on resources, motivation and opportunities for volunteering. To do so, this paper answers the following research questions: to what extent did informal volunteering decline during the first lockdown in the Netherlands? To what extent did this decline depend on changes in individuals’ resources, motivation and opportunities for volunteering?
We derive hypotheses from a general theoretical framework that distinguishes between resources, motivations and opportunities (or human, cultural and social capital). We expect that if a person’s resources, motivations or opportunities decreased (increased) informal volunteering decreased more (less) strongly.
We use panel data from SOCON, collected in February 2019 or February 2020 (wave 1) and July 2020 (wave 2), allowing for a natural experimental design. Measuring informal volunteering, respondents were asked how often they had helped relatives, friends, and neighbors with practical things, such as doing chores or grocery shopping, in the last year (wave 1) or during the lockdown (wave 2) (1=never, 7=every day). We used individual-level data from SOCON as predictors of resources, opportunities and motivations.
We performed regression analyses with informal volunteering in wave 2 as the dependent variable, controlling for informal volunteering in wave 1. These analyses show that informal volunteering declined during the lockdown. This decline is smaller among those who increased social contact, were concerned for relatives, became unemployed or felt solidarity with other people. The decline was larger among those who had poor health, were concerned about their well-being or decreased social contact. Age, having young children and working from home did not affect the decline in informal volunteering.
Study research question
to what extent did informal helping decline during the first lockdown in the Netherlands? To what extent does this decline depend on individuals’ resources, motivation and opportunities for helping?
Collection provenance
- Collected during project
- Data collected added to existing collection
Collection methods
- Questionaire
Personal data
Yes
External Source
Source description
Only the data from individuals who participated in the July 2020 data collection round have been included. Data from other respondents was excluded
File formats
- SPSS file
Data types
- Structured
Languages
Coverage start
Coverage end
15/03/2020
01/06/2020
Spatial coverage
the Netherlands
Collection period start
01/01/2019
Collection period end
31/08/2020
Variables
Unit
Unit description
Sample size
Sampling method
Individuals
People living in the Netherlands between 18 and 70 years old
1044 to 1100 observations of 522 to 550 individuals
Stratified sampling method with an oversampling of people under 30 years old
Hypothesis
Theory
In general, informal helping declined during the first lockdown of the corona crisis in the Netherlands
Resource theory in volunteering
People with poor health reduced their informal helping more strongly during the first lockdown than others
Human capital/resources in volunteering
People over the age of 65 reduced their informal helping more strongly during the first lockdown than others
Human capital/resources in volunteering
People who have young children reduced their informal helping more strongly during the first lockdown than others
Time and resources necessary for volunteering
People who lost work during the lockdown reduced their informal helping less strongly during the lockdown
Time and resources necessary for volunteering
People who worked from home reduced their informal helping less strongly during this period
Time and resources necessary for volunteering
The more concerned a person is about contracting COVID-19, the more strongly they reduced their informal helping during the lockdown
Cultural capital/motivations for volunteering
The more concerned a person is about others contracting COVID-19, the less strongly they reduced their informal helping during the lockdown
Cultural capital/motivation for volunteering
The more a person’s feelings of solidarity increased, the less strongly they reduced their informal helping during the lockdown
Cultural capital/motivation for volunteering
People who increased their social contact reduced their informal helping less than people that did not change and people who decreased their social contact reduced their informal helping more than people who did not changeeased their social contact during the lockdown
Social capital/opportunities necessary for volunteering
Variable type
Variable name
Variable description
Dependent variable
Informal helping for relatives
Measured in the second wave
Dependent variable
Informal helping for friends
Measured in the second wave
Dependent variable
Informal helping for neighbors
Measured in the second wave
Independent variable
Having poor health
yes/no
Independent variable
Being over 65 years old
yes/no
Independent variable
Having young children
yes/no
Independent variable
Lost work during lockdown
yes/no
Independent variable
Working frome home
from 'never' to 'aways'
Independent variable
Concerned for self regarding COVID-19
—
Independent variable
Concerned for relatives regarding COVID-19
only included when informal helping for relatives (w2) is dependent variable
Independent variable
Concerned for friends regarding COVID-19
only included when informal helping for friends (w2) is dependent variable
Independent variable
Concerned for neighbors regarding COVID-19
only included when informal helping for neighbors (w2) is dependent variable
Independent variable
Increased feelings of solidarity
—
Independent variable
Change in contact with relatives
No change. vs. decrease vs. increase | only included when informal helping for relatives (w2) is dependent variable
Independent variable
Change in contact with friends
No change vs. decrease vs. increase | only included when informal helping for friends (w2) is dependent variable
Independent variable
Change in contact with neighbors
No change vs. decrease vs. increase | only included when informal helping for neighbors (w2) is dependent variable
Control variable
Gender
male vs. female
Control variable
Education
Education in years
Control variable
Informal helping before the lockdown
For specific target group depending on the dependent variable
Control variable
Year participated in first wave | Migrant status
2019 vs. 2020 | migrants vs. native
Discipline-specific operationalizations
Conflict of interest
Data packages
COVID-19 Panel Survey
Data package DOI
10.17026/dans-z93-whrh
Description
Data from the COVID-19 survey + information about respondents participating in the survey from earlier waves
Accessibility
Open Access
Repository
DANS Easy Archive
User license
Retention period
Publications
Decline in informal helping during the first COVID-19 lockdown: a longitudinal analysis of Dutch data
Published in European Societies
Documents
Filename
Description
Date
Ethics
Ethical assessment
No
Ethical committee