Double standards in facilitating norm violations: A field experiment on attempted free-riding in public transport

Project info

Work package
  • Inclusion
  • Synthesis
Sustainability threat
  • External Shocks
Challenge
  • Accommodating newcomers

Study info

Description of Study
Norms regulate cooperation in society but are sometimes threatened by norm violators. To sustain cooperation, people need to be willing to enforce norms by sanctioning norm violators. However, people may also act against the norm by facilitating the norm violator’s actions. Why people sometimes react to norm violators by enforcing the norm and other times by acting against the norm is an unresolved puzzle. We study whether responses to norm violations depend on the norm violator’s ethnic group membership. In a field experiment, confederates violate the norm of paying for public transport by attempting to free-ride. Confederates approach travelers who are about to go through check-in gates at Dutch train stations and request to follow them without checking in themselves. We observe whether travelers enforce the norm by rejecting this request or facilitate violating the norm by helping the confederates to free-ride. In total, 801 travelers were individually approached at three train stations by ten different confederates, five with a visibly native-majority background and five with a visibly ethnic-minority background. We find that confederates with a native-majority background are more likely to receive help with free-riding than confederates with an ethnic-minority background across all locations, travelers of all age groups, and all experimental sessions. Content analysis of the travelers’ responses to the free-riding request shows that these were more disapproving and less helpful toward confederates with an ethnic-minority background. Our findings reveal double standards in real-life behaviors toward norm violators with different ethnic backgrounds.
Study research question
What factors cause people to react to norm violators by enforcing the norm or by facilitating norm violations?
Collection provenance
  • Collected during project
Collection methods
  • Experiment
  • Questionaire
Personal data
Yes
External Source
Source description
File formats
Data types
  • Structured
  • Unstructured
Languages
Coverage start
Coverage end
Spatial coverage
The netherlands, the train stations at Woerden, Hilversum, and Amersfoort
Collection period start
01/04/2022
Collection period end
30/06/2022

Variables

Unit
Unit description
Sample size
Sampling method
Individuals
travelers
801
Hypothesis
Theory
Outgroup norm violators are less likely to receive help with the norm violation than ingroup norm violators
Outgroup norm violators are more likely to receive disapproval than ingroup norm violators.
Variable type
Variable name
Variable description
Dependent variable
Norm enforcement
Dependent variable
Facilitating norm violations
Independent variable
(ethnic) group membership of norm violator
Discipline-specific operationalizations
Conflict of interest
No conflicts of interest

Data packages

Publications

Documents

Filename
Description
Date

Ethics

Ethical assessment
Yes
Ethical committee
Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences of Utrecht University