Project info
Work package
- Synthesis
Sustainability threat
- External Shocks
- Spillovers
Challenge
- Reconciling stakeholder interests
- Reshaping organizational forms
- Shared responsibility and sustainable cooperation
Study info
Description of Study
Collective agency is often defended in terms of an interpretivist conception of agency. The idea is that the externally observable behavior of organized collectives is interpretable, and thus explainable, via the posits of beliefs, desires, and intentions. From this perspective, collective agents can be treated as black boxes. Just as an interpreter can ignore the brain processes of individual agents, she can disregard the inner workings of a collective agent. Here I argue against such externalist versions of corporate interpretivism and defend an internalist alternative. My core claim is that knowledge of the intentional states of individual members involved in the internal processes of collectives should form the primary source of evidence in ascribing corporate intentional states. Hence, collective agents can be interpreted in an accurate manner only if the black box is opened.
Study research question
Collection provenance
- -
Collection methods
Personal data
-
External Source
Source description
File formats
Data types
Languages
Coverage start
Coverage end
Spatial coverage
Collection period start
—
Collection period end
—
Variables
Unit
Unit description
Sample size
Sampling method
Hypothesis
Theory
Variable type
Variable name
Variable description
Discipline-specific operationalizations
Conflict of interest
Data packages
Publications
Explaining collective agency: A defense of internalist corporate interpretivism
The Philosophical Quarterly
Documents
Filename
Description
Date
Ethics
Ethical assessment
Unknown
Ethical committee