Heteroprofessionalism at Work: Identity Conflict, Disclosure, and Related Negative Emotions in Heteronormative Workplaces

Project info

Work package
  • Work
Sustainability threat
  • External Shocks
Challenge
  • Reshaping organizational forms

Study info

Description of Study
Heteroprofessionalism, the workplace-specific institutionalization of heteronormativity, equates professionalism with cis-heterosexual norms, subtly shaping norms around identity expression at work. Building on this concept, this study investigates how lesbian, gay, and bi+ (LGB+) employees navigate their sexual identities in heteronormative workplace settings. It contrasts their experiences of identity conflict, behavioral strategies, and emotional responses with those of non-LGB+ peers across workplace and non-work contexts. It further examines whether perceived inclusive team climate mitigates these adverse experiences. An online survey of 198 UK employees revealed that referencing one’s own sexual identity was seen as significantly less appropriate in the workplace than outside of it. Heteroprofessionalism manifested in three key ways: LGB+ employees reported greater identity conflict (cognitive), lower disclosure motivation and higher disclosure avoidance (behavioral), and more negative emotions (emotional) than non-LGB+ employees. Importantly, perceived inclusive team climate moderated these effects, buffering identity conflict and disclosure avoidance among LGB+ participants. By theorizing heteroprofessionalism as a systemic barrier to authentic sexual identity expression at work, this research illuminates its cognitive, behavioral, and emotional manifestations, while underscoring the potential of inclusive climates in fostering identity integration.
Study research question
Collection provenance
  • Collected during project
Collection methods
  • Questionaire
Personal data
No
External Source
Source description
File formats
Data types
  • Structured
Languages
  • English
Coverage start
Coverage end
Spatial coverage
Collection period start
Collection period end

Variables

Unit
Unit description
Sample size
Sampling method
Hypothesis
Theory
Variable type
Variable name
Variable description
Discipline-specific operationalizations
Conflict of interest
None

Data packages

Publications

Documents

Filename
Description
Date

Ethics

Ethical assessment
Yes
Ethical committee
Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences of Utrecht University