Project info
Work package
- Work
Sustainability threat
- External Shocks
Challenge
- Reshaping organizational forms
Study info
Related studies according to this researcher
The Double-Edged Sword of “Being Out” at Work: Its Impact on Perceived Professionalism, Morality, and Cooperation Intentions
From Policy to Perceptions: A Multilevel Study of Diversity Approaches and Perceived Inclusive Climate
Heteroprofessionalism at Work: Identity Conflict, Disclosure, and Related Negative Emotions in Heteronormative Workplaces
“In Certain Situations, it’s Better for You to Act this Way Rather than Another” — LGBQ Academic Staff Members’ Selective Disclosure Decisions at Work
“It’s Not Always Possible to Live Your Life Openly or Honestly in the Same Way” — Workplace Inclusion of Lesbian and Gay Humanitarian Aid Workers in Doctors Without Borders
Related studies according to other researchers
From Policy to Perceptions: A Multilevel Study of Diversity Approaches and Perceived Inclusive Climate
Heteroprofessionalism at Work: Identity Conflict, Disclosure, and Related Negative Emotions in Heteronormative Workplaces
The Double-Edged Sword of “Being Out” at Work: Its Impact on Perceived Professionalism, Morality, and Cooperation Intentions
Description of Study
Despite efforts to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion, biases against women and LGB+ employees persist in the workplace. This study investigates how gender identity, sexual orientation, and their expression intersect to influence perceived professionalism. Using a factorial vignette design, we manipulated gender (woman, man), sexual orientation (heterosexual, bisexual, gay/lesbian), gender expression (feminine, gender-neutral, masculine), and sexual orientation disclosure (full disclosure, selective disclosure, full concealment) within fictitious employee profiles. A representative sample of 376 UK participants evaluated six randomized profiles on perceived professionalism. Results reveal significant biases against LGB employees, particularly those who fully disclose their sexual orientation. Men with feminine expressions faced harsher penalties, while women experienced more flexibility in expressing gender non-conforming traits. These findings highlight how status beliefs privileging cis-heterosexual masculine men shape perceived professionalism.
Keywords: Intersectionality, workplace, LGB+, identity disclosure, gender, gender expression, factorial vignettes
Study research question
Collection provenance
- Collected during project
Collection methods
- Vignette survey
Personal data
No
External Source
Source description
File formats
Data types
- Structured
Languages
- English
Coverage start
Coverage end
Spatial coverage
Collection period start
—
Collection period end
—
Variables
Unit
Unit description
Sample size
Sampling method
Hypothesis
Theory
Variable type
Variable name
Variable description
Discipline-specific operationalizations
Conflict of interest
None
Data packages
Publications
Documents
Filename
Description
Date
Ethics
Ethical assessment
Yes
Ethical committee
Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences of Utrecht University