• Work

• External Shocks

• Dealing with diversity
• Identity flexibility and sustainable cooperation
• Reshaping organizational forms

Injecting realism in simulation models: Do selection and social influence jointly promote cooperation? The interdependence of social deliberation and judgment aggregation Diffusion of Binary vs Continuous Behavior across Social Networks The interplay of misperceptions and willingness to share opinions in full classroom networks: the case of opinions towards homosexuality Talk Less to Strangers: How Homophily Can Improve Collective Decision-Making in Diverse Teams Ill-informed consensus or truthful disagreement? How argumentation styles and preference perceptions affect deliberation outcomes in groups with conflicting stakes

Ill-informed consensus or truthful disagreement? How argumentation styles and preference perceptions affect deliberation outcomes in groups with conflicting stakes Talk Less to Strangers: How Homophily Can Improve Collective Decision-Making in Diverse Teams

Established modelling frameworks in formal social epistemology are insufficiently complex to faithfully express situated knowledge and standpoints, two core notions from feminist epistemology. They may capture standpoint occupancy in terms of surface notions like agents' verisimilitude or epistemic steadfastness, but, in doing so, they risk ‘interpretative overloading’ of their basic model features. To address this problem, I propose an extension to the recently introduced framework “NormAN”, in which agents use heterogeneous Bayes' nets to perform Bayesian updating on evidence they encounter through inquiry or communication. Inspired by Saint-Croix 2020, I then model standpoint occupancy via adherence to formal constraints on the subjective perspectives that agents entertain about the causal structure of their world.

• -

• Simulation

-

—

—