Project info
Project name
6.4 Reconciling epistemic and demographic diversity
Work package
- Synthesis
Sustainability threat
- Feedback Cycles
Challenge
- Dealing with diversity
Study info
Related studies according to this researcher
A bad barrel spoils a good apple: How uncertainty and networks affect whether matching rules can foster cooperation
Are organizational gender diversity management practices effective?
Socially situating NormAN: Standpoints and epistemic diversity in a Bayesian, agent-based model.
Cooperation between newcomers and incumbents: The role of normative disagreements
Related studies according to other researchers
Diversity and Social Learning
Ill-informed consensus or truthful disagreement? How argumentation styles and preference perceptions affect deliberation outcomes in groups with conflicting stakes
Socially situating NormAN: Standpoints and epistemic diversity in a Bayesian, agent-based model.
Realtime user ratings as a strategy for combatting misinformation: an experimental study
Description of Study
Identity diversity in teams brings advantages for complex decision-making because it is associated with cognitive diversity among team members. At the same time, homophilous interactions along shared identity dimensions can hinder information exchange among dissimilar individuals and threaten successful exploitation of the team’s cognitive diversity. We present an agent-based model to investigate how homophily impacts decision-making quality in diverse teams. Team members communicate information in a ‘hidden profile’ setting where some pieces of information are known only to single individuals while other pieces of information are known to subgroups with the same identity. While intuition may suggest that homophily impairs collective decision-making, our model reveals how homophilous environments lead to better collective decisions: homophily fosters temporary disagreements between dissimilar team members, which grant teams additional time to uncover crucial information that would not have been shared otherwise. Longer discussion time comes along with improvements in the quality of the final decision, indicating a trade-off between the time needed to deliberate and decision quality.
Study research question
The present paper uses an agent-based model to theorize how homophilous interaction preferences shape decision-making quality in diverse teams.
Collection provenance
- Collected during project
Collection methods
- Simulation
Personal data
No
External Source
Source description
Not applicable
—
File formats
- output: csv
- model: nlogo
- analysis syntax: stata do
Data types
- Structured
Languages
- English
Coverage start
Coverage end
01/07/1924
31/12/2024
Spatial coverage
nA - theoretical model, simulation
Collection period start
01/01/2023
Collection period end
31/12/2023
Variables
Unit
Unit description
Sample size
Sampling method
Experimental Group
each unit is a simulated discussion group that has to come to a consensual decision
5000
nA - simulation
Hypothesis
Theory
Two competing hypotheses: homophily improves decision-making quality in diverse teams vs. homophily worsens decision-making quality.
Exploration-exploitation, transient diversity, value-in-diversity vs. opinion dynamics & polarization
Variable type
Variable name
Variable description
Dependent variable
Group decision
Consensual decision by group to prefer an option out of a set of options. It is either A, B, C, or no consensus. A, B and C can be ranked according to their quality.
Independent variable
Homophily
Tendency for individuals to preferentially interact with ingroup members and avoid outgroup members.
Discipline-specific operationalizations
Conflict of interest
None to declare
Data packages
Talk less to strangers: How homophily can improve collective decision-making in diverse teams
Data package DOI
https://osf.io/76hfm/
Description
replication package
Accessibility
Open Access
Repository
OSF
User license
Retention period
10
Publications
Talk Less to Strangers: How Homophily Can Improve Collective Decision-Making in Diverse Teams
Stein, J., Frey, V., & Flache, A. (2024). Talk Less to Strangers: How Homophily Can Improve Collective Decision-Making in Diverse Teams. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 27(1), 14.
Documents
Filename
Description
Date
Ethics
Ethical assessment
No
Ethical committee
Simulation - no personal or otherwise sensitive data.