Project info
Work package
- Work
Sustainability threat
- External Shocks
- Feedback Cycles
- Spillovers
Challenge
- Reshaping organizational forms
- Shared responsibility and sustainable cooperation
Study info
Description of Study
In this study, we explore power dynamics among network members occupying different hierarchical positions within their organizations. We adopt the resource dependence theoretical perspective to examine the inter-organizational dynamics at two levels. To capture the multilevel aspect, we apply a structural linked design approach (Lazega, Jourda, Mounier, & Stofer, 2008) to analyze how variation in personal and organizational advantages relate to the (in)ability of members to overcome lack of resources in a long run. This investigation takes the form of a case study of an inter-organizational network in the health care sector that operates in Germany and the Netherlands.
Study research question
We aim to explore if and how participation in multi-level collaborations alters the agentic behavior of its members, especially those in structurally disadvantaged positions within a network and/or their own organization. We ask two questions: first, what is the interplay between organizational-level and individual-level power (dis)advantage? Second, can those without resource or structural advantage can improve their outcomes, and if so, what strategies are available to them?
Collection provenance
- Collected during project
Collection methods
- Interview
- Observation
Personal data
Yes
External Source
Source description
File formats
- .docs
- .mp3
Data types
- Unstructured
Languages
- English
- Dutch
- German
Coverage start
Coverage end
10/10/2018
12/06/2020
Spatial coverage
Germany
the Netherlands
Collection period start
07/10/2018
Collection period end
12/06/2020
Variables
Unit
Unit description
Sample size
Sampling method
Individuals
People who represent their organizations in a collaborative network
14
Total population sampling (all network members)
Organizations
Organizations that comprise the Service Team, a unit that governs the network under study.
4
Total population sampling (all organizations that comprise the Service Team)
Hypothesis
Theory
Individuals who represent the biggest and the most resourceful organization, and have high centrality both within and outside the organizational network would be the most successful in affecting the decision-making and improving their structural position within a network.
Based on Lazega's (2008) multilevel approach to the network governance
Variable type
Variable name
Variable description
Dependent variable
The ability of a network member to successfully negotiate one's interests or affect the decision-making
The variable is specific for this data collection
Independent variable
Organizational size
The variable is specific for this data collection
Independent variable
Organizational control over valuable and unique resources
The variable is specific for this data collection
Independent variable
Individuals' position within organizational hierarchy
The variable is specific for this data collection
Independent variable
Individual position within a network's hierarchy
The variable is specific for this data collection
Discipline-specific operationalizations
Conflict of interest
No
Data packages
Publication package
Data package DOI
—
Description
The package includes: the research questions, the topic guides, the draft of an informed consent forms, the data management plan
Accessibility
Open Access
Repository
RUG intranet
User license
Retention period
10
Research package
Data package DOI
—
Description
Transcripts of the interviews and signed informed consent forms
Accessibility
Closed Access
Repository
RUG intranet
User license
Retention period
10
Publications
Documents
Filename
Description
Date
Ethics
Ethical assessment
Yes
Ethical committee
The Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences at the University of Groningen